A death sentence is usually extended to offenders who pose a threat to public safety and need to be eliminated or hindered from interacting with others. A judge needs to evaluate the presented facts and evidence to implicate the offender with the murder. The accused needs to be proven guilty before receiving the death penalty. A person who has killed someone is likely to execute a similar offense in case he is exposed to a similar situation. What would be public reaction upon meeting someone found guilty of killing an innocent person? The public is likely to react negatively, and no one would be willing to interact or share anything with the offender. This implies that he would lose all his friends as they avoid all issues that are likely to bring them together. What would be public perception regarding a judge who releases a person implicated with killing people back to society? People would doubt the effectiveness and credibility of the judiciary system for allowing an individual who poses a threat to their lives back.
Can the perception change in case the offender killed 100 people? A serial killer is likely to present a higher public safety concern and affect the lives of many people. If the judge fails to execute the death penalty to the individual, a public objection of the court ruling is likely to emerge and question the worthiness of the judgment. Does executing the death penalty affect or promote public safety? Sentencing the offender for the death penalty would have no impact on public safety. This is contrary to when the offender is allowed back to society.
In the above test, I have attempted to explain that executing a death sentence was meant to enhance public safety. This reveals that the judge’s decision is entirely based on the belief that eliminating the offender would make the public safer by removing the individual who posed a threat. Everyone would feel safer when a criminal who is likely to cause death is eliminated. The decision is morally right because it is justifiable to eliminate one person and promote the lives of many people in society. The judge should not allow one malicious person to pose a threat to everyone.